Three Different Main Views Within Full Preterism

April 21/2021

1 Full Preterism has at least seventeen different views within it, but as I see it, they can be boiled down to three different main views that matter within Full Preterism.

2 The first view is the Full Preterist View: also known as Covenant Eschatology. 3 As of today this is the most popular one and it’s the one most have an association with which is just basic Full Preterism. 4 They believe as all Full Preterist do that all the things the Prophets spoke of and wrote into scriptures came to their fulfillments in AD70.

5 Although most in this view would call themselves Full Preterist and along with Partial Preterist they both are actually Anemic Preterist mainly because they still believe the Old Age of Adam’s sin and death which all of mankind inherited from Adam still exists for us today. 6 Partial Preterists are known for believing all things were fulfilled in AD70 except for the returning of Christ because they believe it will be a literal physical return in the future. 7 Full Preterist believe all scriptures that were foretold by the Prophets were fulfilled in AD70 yet they believe that what was going on in the first century remains ongoing for today after all things were made new. 8 They still hold on to the very same things that the first century Church did to be set free from the bondage of sin and death like water baptism, and becoming the Bride of Christ etc. 9 They reading themselves into that to where people still need to be born again from the Spiritual death that they inherited from Adam and Eve. 10 It is comparable to as if after the people of Israel who were in the wilderness had entered into the promised land continued to eat the manna after their first harvest. 11 When in actuality God stopped providing manna to eat once they entered into the promised land after their first harvest. 12 I see it as after all things were made new, that being born again is in a new way likened unto the Parable of the Prodigal Son. 13 So if this be the case then water baptism can also play a role, but in a new way because no one has been under the bondage of corruption of Adam’s sin and death to be considered Spiritual dead. 14 There is a new way for that now by likened unto a Prodigal child. Adam’s death which resulted in hades, Hades was cast into the Lake of Fire so it no longer exist.

15 The Outer Courts signified things like sacrificing animals for sins which Christ fulfilled on the cross which pointed to the Brazen Alter. 16 The Laver for washing signified water baptism with being born again and saved from sin and separation from God. 17 These were all part of God’s plan to get those out of the Spiritual Death that separated all of mankind from the presence God during the Old Age of Adam’s sin and death which all of mankind inherited from Adam. 18 Jesus being sacrificed on the cross was the fulfillment of the Lord’s Passover for individual sin but the Holy Convocation Day of Atonement was for the complete salvation from the Age of Corruption that restored mankind back to God’s presence like before Adam sinned.

19 The problem with the commonly known Full Preterist view is that all those things pasted away when the perfect came and all things were made new in a New Heaven and Earth which was fulfilled in AD70. Yet they seem to be in the state of the former things which were to pass away or cease. 20 In Revelation 11:2 it says that the Outer Courts were not to be measured. 21 The Outer Courts represented the fulfillment of the time between AD30 to AD70 when things played out through water baptism and being delivered out from the Old Covenant. 22 Then the end of the Age occurred with the destruction of the city and Temple the Outer Courts were not to be measured for the new Age that was to come where Adam’s sin and death had been cast into the Lake of Fire.

23 There was no longer a need to be born out from Adam’s death “ Separation from God “ because Adam’s death was cast into the Lake of Fire around that time that the Temple no longer stood. 24 All of mankind was made alive by Christ so that the Great White Throne Judgment could take place to fulfill the Holy Convocation Day of Atonement; but the new way is for a personal judgment at physical death whether good or bad and be rewarded accordingly. 25 The Temple had walls and veils that signified mankind being separated from God which ended that separation for the world when the Temple no longer stood but that separation ended at the cross for believers in Christ while the whole creation were still eagerly waiting for it to apply to all of mankind according to Romans 8:20-22. 26 Without a Temple it was impossible to keep the laws of the Old Covenant so that event ended the Age of the old Heaven and Earth which was the age of corruption they were to be delivered from that was foretold would come to an end by many Prophets like Daniel and Jesus.

27 The second are called the Hyper Preterist Views: Mainline Full Preterism while in its grown stages as been plagued with all kinds of false doctrines that have seeped from the baggage of cultish beliefs found within Christianity. 28 Universalism, Annihilation of Satan and his angels, No Hell, Collective Body View, Covenant Creation and the Israel Only View are all part of this known as Hyper Preterism. 29 Back in 2021 the Full Preterist view seemed to be being annihilated by the Israel Only View and that is what got my attention to try to save it and make it honourable again. 30 Little did I know at the time Edward Stevens was working overtime to do the same thing since 1993 especially for his Individual Body View Vs. the Collective Body View that is known as Hyper Preterist. 31 So he was in a sense a forerunner for me and I learned a lot from him since 2021 so as to provide some framework for me to build on. 32 Before that I was coasting along with Hyper Preterist views which seem to answer the mysteries of the resurrection thinking there were only two opinions Physical Body View or Collective Body View. 33 This set my mind at ease for 18 years thinking there was basically no resurrection at all because it was to them just a switch from the Old Covenant to the New Covenant etc. Boy was I wrong but I’m very glad now there is a hope for us all to receive a Spiritual body for the afterlife. 34 Why would anyone want to believe in a no hope afterlife with a Spiritual body like the Collective or Corporate Body View has. 35 That views eats away at the very faith and hope we are saved by. There have been many people battling these issues who are worthy of double honour. 36 They have been ridiculed by others for having the faith and hope that the word of God leads us to with the help of the Holy Spirit which many Hyper Preterist deny can indwell anyone today. 37 These false teachers who have sold their books etc. should give everyone a refund and apologist and start writing new books which would help them recover from their past. 38 Otherwise they will have to give an account in the afterlife and suffer the consequences.

39 Charles Meek wrote this article which explains Hyper Preterism very well. It is called Hyper Preterism by Charles Meek: “Quote”

Hyper-Preterism

“Hyper-preterism is an appropriate term for any preterist who holds that sin, salvation, the church, the gospel, and God’s eternal character, plan and expectations came to an end in AD 70. Conversely, it is not appropriate as a label for a preterist who merely believes that the Old Testament system came to an end at that time, along with the general resurrection of souls out of Hades, all coinciding with the promised Parousia. We rejoice in God’s continuing application of his work of redemption accomplished once for all times for all his people, past/present/future, through his Son.” — Bruce Thevenot

In part because the church has never had a formal discussion about eschatology, there is a diverse array of opinions on this subject among Christians. Eschatology is the Theological Wild West.

Even among preterists there is much disagreement. It is my opinion that some preterists (partial-preterists) do not go far enough in acknowledging what happened in AD 70. Other preterists (hyper-preterists) go too far.

Hyper-preterism is a term used to describe taking the past fulfillment of biblical prophecy beyond what the Bible teaches. I am concerned that hyper-preterism is damaging the preterist cause, indeed is damaging to Christianity. Just how bad is this problem? Well, here is what one vocal advocate posted on his website: “I believe biblical Christianity ended on Earth when Jesus Christ returned at the destruction of Jerusalem around 70 A.D.”

While there have been other attempts at defining hyper-preterism, I will give it a go myself. As I see it, there are seven errors that define hyper-preterism:

OVER-LITERALIZING THE TERM “ALL IS FULFILLED.” Just as in modern English, the Bible sometimes uses the word “all” or “every” in a sense other than “every last thing.” Context and reason are determinative. Even hyper-preterists cannot consistently cling to this mantra. For example, when Peter said that the “end of all things is at hand” (1 Peter 4:7), he obviously did not mean literally all things because we are here! This idea is at the root of the ridiculous “Israel Only” idea that has poisoned preterism.
THE IDEA THAT SOTERIOLOGICAL (SALVIFIC) WORKINGS OF GOD ENDED IN AD 70, WHICH OFTEN RESULTS IN UNIVERALISM. Just because all specific prophecies have been fulfilled does not mean that God’s work ended in AD 70. This error stems from the failure to grasp that (a) The Kingdom of God was instituted progressively during the 40-year transition period, commencing with Jesus’ First Advent (Mark 1:14-15; Luke 11:20). So, the Kingdom of God was not tied to AD 70. (b) Jesus’ reign in the New Covenant Kingdom continues indefinitely into the future (Daniel 7:13-14; Luke 18:29-30; Ephesians 1:21; 2:7; 3:21; Hebrews 1:8-12; 5:6; 6:20; 7:16-28; Revelation 11:15; 14:6). (c) God’s judgment continues into the future (2 Corinthians 5:10; Hebrews 9:27), and (d) God did not quit working (Psalm 46:1; Isaiah 40:28; Matthew 18:14; Luke 11:10; John 16:13; Romans 8:38-39; Hebrews 9:14; 13:8; Revelation 3:20; etc.)! The conclusion of universal salvation, given the multitude of passages in the New Testament about the exclusivity of Christ and the necessity to believe in Him alone for salvation, is an incredible twisting of Scripture (Matthew 7:21-23; John 3:16, 18, 36; 6:47; 8:1; 14:6; Acts 4:12; Romans 9:14-18; 10:4-13; 1 Timothy 2:5; 1 John 2:23; 5:10-12; etc.).
THE NOTION THAT SIN LITERALLY ENDED IN AD 70. This error is related to #2 above, as it also contributes to universalism. It is, frankly, an outrageous biblical error that places these hyper-preterists outside of Christianity itself, in my opinion. This error is so obvious from the Bible that it hardly seems necessary to address it, but since some hyper-preterists are so vocal in this, we are forced to address it. The sinful nature of man is a doctrine that separates Christianity from all other worldviews and religions. All others, including Islam and secular humanism, teach that man is basically good and is perfectible by law and education. And especially for the Christian, to deny sin opens the door for any and all immorality. This error also means that repentance and confession are no longer necessary—an incredible conclusion that cannot be condemned loudly enough.

Those who hold to this idea often appeal to Romans 4:15 which states that “where there is no law, there is no transgression.” (cf. Romans 5:13b) So, it is argued, since the Mosaic Law is no longer valid, there is no longer any such thing as sin. Answer: This objection is clearly twisting Scripture by appealing to a passage in a wooden literal way, and without considering the greater context. Indeed, moral law existed prior to the law of Moses. Think about God’s judgment against the sins of Noah’s neighbors, Sodom and Gomorrah, the Canaanites, etc. The New Testament affirms the validity of the Ten Commandments, at least in some manner—after the institution of the new covenant at Jesus’ first advent. So, the only reasonable explanation of this passage is the one given by the highly respected commentator John Gill, who explained: “The law of Moses was added for the better discovery and detection of sin.”

The Bible teaches that mankind has a sinful or “fleshly” nature which is universal and runs deep. Take the time to go back and read these passages: Genesis 6:5, 8:21; 1 Kings 8:46; Job 14:1-4; 25:2-6; Psalm 14; 51:3-5; 53:1-3; 58:3-5; 143:1-2; Ecclesiastes 7:20; Isaiah 53:6; 55:8-9; 59:2; 64:6; Jeremiah 17:9; Daniel 9:1-11; Mark 7:20-23; Romans 3:9-20; 5:12-21; 7:13-25; 8:5-8; 14:23; Galatians 5:16-21; Ephesians 2:1-3; James 2:10-11; 1 John 1:8-10. The nature of man did not change at Christ’s Parousia!

It’s worth reiterating that the New Covenant World began at Christ’s First Advent, not at the Parousia, and continues forever (Daniel 7:13-14; Luke 18:29-30; Ephesians 1:21; 2:7; 3:21; Revelation 11:15). Paul and the other New Testament writers, while teaching that the Law of Moses had given way to grace, frequently also taught that this fact did not nullify demands for righteous living (Romans 3:31; 6:1-23; 2 Peter 2:2; 1 John 3:3-10). In fact, Paul taught that the unrighteous would not inherit the kingdom (1 Corinthians 6:9-20; Galatians 5:19-21)!

The law continues as it is “written on our hearts” (Jeremiah 31:33; Romans 2:15; 1 Timothy 1:5; Hebrews 10:16), which the honest Christian will have to admit when he or she examines himself. In other words, we have a conscience. These hyper-preterists have somehow managed to dismiss reality by letting their consciences become seared through wishful thinking. This is SOCIOPATHIC! As the Bible teaches, If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves (1 John 1:8), and whenever we stumble on one point we are guilty of breaking the whole law (James 2:10)! If they justify the notion that they are without sin—because of an interpretation of the New Testament—looking into their own hearts (not to mention their past actions) should force them to see that they must have misinterpreted the New Testament. (Maybe they should take the Good Person Test: http://www.areyouagoodperson.org).

It is difficult to know how these hyper-preterists have come to the understanding that they do not sin. But I suspect that some of it can be traced to the high percentage of them that have come out of legalistic backgrounds. Even after coming out of legalism, they have yet to grasp the doctrines of grace. It may also be that these people are merely living in a utopian dream world in which there is no judgment against them or their friends. This, of course, is the same tired idiocy of liberalism. (If you don’t like the implications of what is true, just deny it and it goes away.)

4. THE COLLECTIVE (CORPORATE) BODY VIEW OF THE RESURRECTION (“CBV”). This is the idea that resurrection is nothing more than corporate justification of Israel. While there is, indeed, an element of justification in eschatology, I believe that the Bible is clear that the Christian hope rests on the promise of a bodily resurrection (described in the Bible as spiritual, immortal, or glorified body) to heaven. Jesus said that we will be like angels in heaven (Matthew 22:30; Mark 12:25). At the Transfiguration, Moses and Elijah had recognizable spiritual bodies. The CBV, if accepted as a stand-alone concept of resurrection, muddles the Christian hope of heaven. Its error results from a failure to understand that there are two types of resurrections: a soteriological “resurrection” of the living (Romans 6:1-14, Ephesians 2:1-7; Colossians 2:12-14; 3:1-4; 1 John 3:14; etc.) and an immortal-body eschatological resurrection of the dead out of hades to heaven (Daniel 12:2-13; Matthew 25:3-46; John 6:39-40; 2 Timothy 4:1; Revelation 20:11-15; etc.). While this will garner a lot of disagreement even from solid full-preterists whom I respect, I am persuaded that these two types of resurrections are necessarily different, not only in time but in nature. These are related, as one must be justified in order to get to heaven, but they are different.

5. OVER-SPIRITUALIZING THE RESURRECTION BY SAYING THAT HEAVEN IS ON EARTH, OR THAT HEAVEN OFFERS NOTHING BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAVE ON EARTH. This stems, I think, from at least three things:

It is a failure to appreciate that the idiom “(new) heaven and earth”—just as in modern English—is not the same thing as heaven itself. I discuss this at some length in my book, but this should be pretty obvious when you stop to think about it.

As above, it is a failure to understand that there are two types of resurrections: a soteriological “resurrection” of the living and an immortal-body eschatological resurrection of the dead. While this will garner a lot of disagreement even from solid full-preterists whom I respect, I am persuaded that these two types of resurrections are necessarily different, not only in time but in nature. Many futurists quickly notice that some preterists limit resurrection to a spiritualized-only version, and it becomes a stumbling block for them to pursue the preterist viewpoint.

In addition, these hyper-preterists apparently think we are in heaven now because of a gross over-literalization (or misuse) of such passages as 1 Corinthians 13:9-12 and 1 John 3:2, which imply that since AD 70 we have seen Jesus “face-to-face” and have seen Him “as He is.” Obviously no living person has seen Jesus literally face-to-face and these passages cannot be used legitimately to say that we are in heaven now.

6. THE IDEA THAT WE MUST NECESSARILY GIVE UP THE SACRAMENTS OF BAPTISM AND THE LORD’S SUPPER, BASED ON CERTAIN PASSAGES, ESPECIALLY 1 CORINTHIANS 11:26. This passage may suggest that the Lord’s Supper should cease at the Parousia in AD 70. It is true that the New Testament focuses intensely on the imminent Parousia, as that would mark the fulfillment of Jesus’ eschatological promises. But 1 Corinthians 11:26 does not preclude celebrating the Lord’s Supper after AD 70. “Until” does not equal “terminate.” It strikes me as ironic that some preterists are so intent on challenging futurists (especially dispensationalists) about interpreting the Bible in a wooden-literal sense, when these same preterists are guilty of the identical error! How can it NOT honor Jesus to continue with these wonderful institutions today? To think otherwise is sadly legalistic.

7. THE NOTION THAT GENESIS DOES NOT SPEAK OF GOD’S CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE. This idea, often called “covenant creationism,” says that since the “end times” are about the end of the old covenant, Genesis is all about the creation of God’s covenants with mankind. In Revelation, we find “the new heaven and new earth,” which is about the new covenant. Thus, in Genesis, the statement that God “created the heavens and the earth,” is about the creation of the old covenant rather than about the physical universe. Indeed, covenant creationists may conclude that the Bible NEVER speaks about God creating the physical universe. But that idea denigrates the nature of God. And it simply does not hold up biblically, as there are numerous times in Scripture (in addition to Genesis 1:1) that we find statements about God’s creation of the physical world (Job 38; Psalm 8:3; 96:3-10; 102:25-27; 121:1-2; 139:13-16; Isaiah 44:24-25; 51:13; Jeremiah 10:11-16 (“all things”); 31:35-38; Matthew 19:4-6; Mark 10:6; Acts 4:24; 14:15; 17:24, 25, 28; Romans 1:20; Colossians 1:16-17). Covenant Creationism not only fails on inspection, it leads to some very dangerous doctrines. For example, they may deny that mankind has a sinful nature resulting from Adam’s fall. But Paul in Romans 5 directly ties the Christ’s salvation as the antidote to Adam’s curse. This is a fundamental tenant of the Christian faith. The reader may discern that this error too is related to the heresy of universalism, because if man’s sin is not an issue, then all men can be saved.

Hyper-preterists, indeed, have a lot in common with standard ole liberals: Everything and nothing are true. We need to go back to basics. So, let me conclude this article with a declaration of the gospel, which Christians have in one form or another given to the world for two thousand years, and which I proclaim again but in a preterist format:

The gospel is Jesus’ perfect life, his atoning death, his resurrection, and his completed redemption at his AD 70 Effectual Divine Presence—which is the power of God unto salvation for everyone who believes.

“End Quote”

40 The Israel Only View believes that no one outside of being naturally born an Old Covenant Israeli or the ten Tribes that were considered Gentiles has any thing to do with God or His promises because they were only given to Israel. 41 In other words everyone who was not born from a natural bloodline from Israel has no hope or relationship with God nor are God’s promises to any other nation except for Israel. 42 This view leads many of those who believe that into atheism. 43 The main problem with this view is that they have failed to see how God used Israel through types and foreshadowings that would be a blessing to all of the nations on the Earth. 44 The reason why the Israel Only View believers fail to see this is because they have failed to see it in the very first eleven chapters in the Bible from Genesis 1 to 11, John 3:16, John 17 etc. 45 They all associate Adam as being Israel and the Earth as Israel only like the rest on the planet was not there. 46 A lot of people who believe in the Israel Only View carry on a mission to destroy Faith, Hope and Love in God that they believe was only meant for the nation of Israel. 47 I’ve seen Israel Only believers constantly mocking God and they become stumbling blocks to everyone around them. 48 I have seen many strong in their faith as Full Preterist falling for this over the years and ending up as Atheist. 49 Their mission is to destroy everything God intended for mankind through their so-called consistent view of Full Preterism but is the extreme form of Covenant Eschatology. 50 The aftermath of AD70 in their view has everything magically disappear from the face of the Earth because it is as if God does not know of any other nations ever existing aside from Adam to Israel. 51 The main question that the Israel Only View can not answer is why did God require all 70 nations from Noah to attend the Feast of Tabernacle so that those nations could be blessed; that is found in:

Zechariah 14:16And it shall come to pass that everyone who is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall go up from year to year to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, and to keep the Feast of Tabernacles. 17 And it shall be that whichever of the families of the earth do not come up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, on them there will be no rain. 18 If the family of Egypt will not come up and enter in, they shall have no rain; they shall receive the plague with which the Lord strikes the nations who do not come up to keep the Feast of Tabernacles. 19 This shall be the punishment of Egypt and the punishment of all the nations that do not come up to keep the Feast of Tabernacles.

52 The Israel Only View has caused a lot of damage within Preterism. 53 In recent years and finally a lot of groups on facebook banded them from joining because their view can lead to atheism. 54 One group on Facebook where they were most active in with over 2300 members and by far the largest called Preterist Perspectives does not even still exist now.

55 The third view is the called the Full Preterist Worldview “Transcended“: The least popular but the one and only Full Preterist view that has transcended beyond AD70 leaving the former things behind. 56 It is based in New Heaven & Earth Eschatology because of what Paul said that the whole creation was waiting for the Manifestation of the Sons of God to appear in the near future at the second appearing of Christ. 57 This view believes that all the things God did through Israel were in type for the whole creation of mankind with a worldview. 58 It believes that the age from Adam to AD70 when Jerusalem and their Temple was destroyed by the Romans in AD70, the whole creation was in darkness and separated from God because of eating from the Tree of Knowledge except the believers in Christ who were forerunners of the new creation. 59 The last Adam which was Jesus Christ, brought the whole creation back to being in God’s presence in the glory of His light where the gates were open to the Tree of Life. 60 Where all nations of people have the option to either spiritually dwell in the Kingdom of Heaven or Spiritual dwell in Outer Darkness where the Kingdom of Darkness has it’s influence in like manner that the Prodigal Son had been in before he returned back to his father.

61 Israel was just the nation God choose to set apart or sanctify and exhibit his blessings and curses through so that the rest of the world could see into the Spiritual realm. 62 It believes and has faith to receive the blessings that God gave by the adoption of the whole creation and giving them a redemptive Spiritual body for the afterlife instead of going to Hades/Shelo.

63 God’s Kingdom consists of three domains.

1. The Kingdom of Heaven is where we can have our Spiritual dwelling place be here on Earth then continues in the life hereafter with Jesus Christ now known as Immanuel meaning God with Us is King of kings and Lord of lords over all domains.

2. The Earth where Jesus Christ “Immanuel” rules with a Rod of Iron over all nations as King of kings and Lord of lords and where all go through the process of Holy Spirit’s refining fire where we are either saved by the fire or suffer loss of everything in life that can not stand up to God’s consuming fire.

3. The Under Earth is the Spiritual dwelling place of Outer Darkness to those alive on Earth which is part of the Kingdom of Darkness which is the Lake of Fire where Satan is their Spirited Being King .

Philippians 2: 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth,

Revelation 5: 3And no one in heaven or on the earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll, or to look at it.

64 What makes this view so unique is the we are the Offspring of Jesus Christ the Everlasting Father and the first century Church of First Fruits. We are the Manifested Sons of God and do not believe that we are the Church or Bride of Christ. 65 Only the first century saints were and they became the Bride of Christ which also were the Gentiles who were grafted into Spiritual Israel before the end of the Age in AD70. 66 When the new Age had arrived in AD70 the marriage of the Lamb took place and the door to those foolish virgins was shut. Now known with His new name is Immanuel formerly known as Jesus Christ became the husband of the Bride which was the first century Church.

67 Within a day a nation was born as their Spiritual Offspring and this was the Manifestation of the Sons of God which consisted of all of mankind on the Earth:

What happened when Israel returned from the Babylon captivity and rebuilt Jerusalem was a type of the New Heaven and Earth for them which Revelation 21 and 22 became the antitype of. What Israel experience with birth pangs lines up with the antitype for the whole creation in:

Romans 8:22For we know that the whole creation groans and labours with birth pangs together until now.

Isaiah 66:7 “Before she was in labor, she gave birth;
Before her pain came,
She delivered a male child.

Who has heard such a thing?
Who has seen such things?
Shall the earth be made to give birth in one day?
Or shall a nation be born at once?
For as soon as Zion was in labor,
She gave birth to her children.

Shall I bring to the time of birth, and not cause delivery?” says the Lord.
“Shall I who cause delivery shut up the womb?” says your God.

68 Only the Overcomer’s who have been refined in the refining fire of the Holy Spirit would rule with Christ over the nations with a rod of iron in the unseen Spiritual realm. 69 The rest remain in the refining fire until they to enter into the rest of Christ and abide in Him as one as an overcomer in the faith or be cast into the Lake of Fire at their physical death.

70 The Transcended Full Preterist view is relatively new but slowly being revealed to the wise who are open enough to seek for the truth aside from all the baggage from other beliefs within Christianity.

71 Here is a statement that the people of God need to realize now more than ever:

“Christ sojourned in this life, and the teaching of the New Covenant was borne to all the nations, and at once the Romans besieged Jerusalem and destroyed it and the Temple there. At once the whole of the Mosaic law was abolished, with all that remained of the Old Covenant, and the curse passed over to those who became lawbreakers because they obeyed Moses’ law when its time had gone by and still clung ardently to it, for at that very moment the perfect teaching of the New Law was introduced in its place.”

Eusebius, Proof of the Gospel 1.1.6

72 What ceased in AD70 were the types and shadows that foreshadowed Christ. What began when All Things were Made New for the New Heaven and Earth in AD70 was the fulfillment or antitypes of the things that the laws and Feasts of the Lord foreshadowed. 73 They were like a child with a toy car or a model of a car that he built. 74 Once the child reached the perfect age grown up he no longer played with his toy car or fantasied he was drive a model car, because he had bought a real car to drive around in. 75 The antitypes are in the unseen Spiritual realm and once the types were removed the antitypes were established. 76 For an example once the Temple was destroyed the Heavenly temple was all that remained therefore established for the New Heaven and Earth.

77 This is how we can understand what Jesus meant when He said He did not come to destroy the law but to fulfill it. 78 The law that was suppose to be written on the forehead and hand in the Old Covenant as a type, became written in the hearts and mind of those in the New Covenant. 79 Jesus magnified two of the laws for an example not to hate without a just cause oppose to do not murder, and not to look at a married woman with lust for her oppose to adultery. 80 Jesus nailed where sin begins with which is in the heart and mind and dealt with it there, verses in the actual act of doing something against the law. 81 Faith in the blood of Jesus Christ fulfilled all the laws that required a sacrifices and as a result we become a living sacrifice to do God’s will to serve Him.

1 Peter 4: 7 But the end of all things is at hand; therefore be serious and watchful in your prayers.

Hebrews 10:9 then He said, “Behold, I have come to do Your will, O God.” He takes away the first that He may establish the second.

Revelation 21:5 Then He who sat on the throne said, “Behold, I make all things new.” And He said to me, “Write, for these words are true and faithful.”

Here is a link to the Statement of Faith for the New Heaven & Earth Worldview:

https://manifestedsonsofgodad70.com/statement-of-faith-2/

Share this: